SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(All) 60

DILIP B. BHOSALE, SHASHI KANT GUPTA, SUNEET KUMAR
MAST RAM TIWARI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel :
Rajesh Kumar Singh for the Applicant; S.A. Murtaza, A.G.A. for the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Dilip B. Bhosale, C.J.—The question referred to this Bench is, whether the limitation for filing an appeal at the instance of the victim or the first informant is 60 days from the date of acquittal as laid down under Section 378 (5) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘CrPC’) or 90 days as reported by the Stamp Reporter pursuant to the judgment of a coordinate Bench of this Court in Nanhey Singh @ Dinesh Singh v. State of U.P. and others, Criminal Misc. Application Defective under Section 372 CrPC (Leave to Appeal) No. 83 of 2013, decided on 22.7.2013.

2. This question has been formulated and referred by a Division Bench, while dealing with Criminal Misc. Application under Section 372 Cr.P.C. (Leave to Appeal) No. 351 of 2017. The Criminal Misc Application has been instituted on behalf of the complainant against the judgment and order dated 1.8.2017 rendered by Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 1, Banda, whereby the respondents-accused were acquitted of the charges punishable under Sections 364/376 of Indian Penal Code (for short, ‘IPC’) re

















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top