SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(All) 267

M. C. DESAI, R. S. PATHAK
Hindustan Commercial Bank Ltd. Varanasi – Appellant
Versus
Collector – Respondent


JUDGMENT

R.S. Pathak, J. - This is a revision application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure praying for the quashing of an order made by the learned Civil Judge, Varanasi. The case first came on for hearing before our brother Asthana who being of the opinion that a question of substantial importance arose in the case referred it to a larger Bench.

2. The respondents, Moolchand, Haridas and Raghunath Prasad, constituted a partnership firm, Messrs Kanhaiya Oil Mills, which had a branch business under the name of Moolchand Haridas. The applicant, the Hindustan Commercial Bank Ltd., obtained a decree against Moolchand Haridas for Rs. 25,000/-. The applicant put the decree into execution against the three partners, and in execution attached three houses belonging to them. Two houses. No. K. 46/186 and K. 47/144, were auctioned on July 9, 1959 for a total sum of Rs. 4,600/-, and the sale was confirmed on September 22, 1959. The third house, No. K. 47/103, was auctioned on July 14, 1959 for Rs. 9,500/. and the sale was confirmed on Oct. 25, 1960. Pursuant to income tax assessments against the partnership firm, M/S Kanhaiya Oil Mills, its liability to income tax was determine

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top