SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(All) 986

K.J.THAKER
Harindra Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.K. Dubey, Adv., Manoj Kumar, Adv., Ashok Mehta, Adv., Devendra Gupta, Adv., S.N. Srivastava, Adv., Shiv Kumar Pal, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Kaushal Jayendra Thaker, J.

Heard Sri K.K. Dubey for the appellant and Sri Devendra Gupta, Senior Advocate, for the respondents.

2. By means of this appeal, the appellant challenges the order dated 26.5.2000 passed by District Judge, Jhansi, in Misc. Case No.15 of 1998, whereby District Judge set aside the arbitral award dated 20.10.1997 passed by Arbitrator on the ground that reasons were ascribed and that the respondent to whom the arbitrator wrote a letter and deposited the award along with Annexure-A in two separate covers by raising the objection for payment of only the final bill, the Union of India did not produce before the authority below the second envelop which contained the reasons given by the arbitrator for allowing and/or disallowing the claim either of the appellant or the respondent.

3. The facts in brief are that by virtue of an agreement executed between the Union of India and Harindra Singh on 8.12.1987 the contract was given for a work for the value of Rs.31,48,602.40. The work was to commence from 30.121987 and was agreed to be over within a year by










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top