PRADEEP KUMAR SINGH BAGHEL, PANKAJ BHATIA
Sriram Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition for issuance of a writ of Certiorari to quash the reports dated 5.12.2018 and 25.2.2019. He has also sought a direction upon the respondents to demarcate the land of the petitioner i.e. Khasra No. 342 and further deliver the possession of the same to him. The reliefs sought in the writ petition amongst other are extracted below:
(ii) a writ of mandamus directing to respondents to demarcate the land of the petitioner (KhasaraNo.342) situated in village Raunapur tehsil Sagari district Azamgarh and further deliver the possession of the same to him.”
2. The facts are these. The petitioner claims that Khasra No. 342 in Village Raunapur, Tehsil and District Azamgarh is recorded in revenue records in the name of the petitioner, Vishwanath and Ajay. Another Khasra No. 345 is recorded in the names of Lal Bihari, Parashuram and Durbali. Both Khasra Nos. 342 and 345 are adjacent to each other. It is stated that they have occupied the land of one Ramsurat who is owner of Arazi No. 3
T. Arivandandam v. T.V. Satyapal and another
Varinderpal Singh v. Hon'ble Mr. Justice M. R. Sharma and others
Gurgaon Gramin Bank v. Khazani and another
Phool Chandra, and another v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Varinderpal Singh v. M.R. Sharma
Ramrameshwari Devi v. Nirmala Devi
Gurgaon Grarftin Bank v. Khazani
Subrata Roy Sahara v. Union of India and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.