GOVIND MATHUR, SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH
Nuzhat Perween – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Being transmitted by the Supreme Court, this Habeas Corpus petition is before us for adjudication.
2. Smt. Nuzhat Parween, mother of the detenue Dr. Kafeel Khan has preferred this petition assailing validity of the detention order dated 13th February, 2020 passed by the District Magistrate, Aligarh invoking powers under sub-Section (2) of Section 3 of the National Security Act, 1980. Factual matrix of the case is as follows:-
3. After obtaining the degree of Doctor in Medicine (MD), Dr. Kafeel Khan, the detenue entered in service of the State of Uttar Pradesh being appointed as Lecturer at Baba Raghav Das Medical College, Gorakhpur (B.R.D. Medical College, Gorakhpur) in the month of August, 2016.
4. An unfortunate incident occurred at the teaching hospital attached with B.R.D. Medical College, Gorakhpur in the intervening night of 10/11 August, 2017 due to unexpected shortage in supply of liquid oxygen. In a course of disciplinary action, the detenue was placed under suspension on 22nd August, 2019, which was followed by a memorandum of allegations dated 12th September, 2017.
5. For the ill-happenings in the intervening night of 10th/11th August, 2017, a criminal case was
Asha Keshavrao Bhosale Vs. Union of India and another
Commissioner of Police v. Gordhandas Bhanji [AIR 1952 SC 16 : 1952 SCR 135]
Debu Mahto v. State of West Bengal [(1974) 4 SCC 135 : 1974 SCC (Cri) 274]
Fawceit Properties Ltd. v. Buckingham County Council [1961 AC 636 : (1960) 3 All ER 503]
Khudi Ram Das Vs. State of West Bengal & 3 Ors.
Magan Gope Vs. The State of West Bengal
Pratap Singh v. State of Punjab [AIR 1964 SC 72 : (1964) 4 SCR 733]
Ram Bali Rajbhar Vs. The State of West Bengal and others
Rajinder Arora Vs. Union of India & Ors.
Subramanian Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and another
Smith v. West Ellor Rural District Council [1956 AC 736 : (1956) 1 All ER 855]
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.