SUNEET KUMAR
Saksham Pathak (Minor) – Appellant
Versus
Vishal Dubey – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Shri Dilip Kumar, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Rizwan Ahmad, learned counsels for the petitioner and Shri Anil Kumar Srivastava, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Shri Rahul Shukla, learned counsels for the respondents.
2. The instant petition has been filed for custody of the corpus (Saksham Pathak) through Amit Kumar Pathak (father) (A-1). The corpus is in the custody of the respondents.
3. The facts giving rise to the instant petition filed for writ of habeas corpus is that A-1 is the only natural and legal guardian of the corpus aged about four years. A-1 is in the employment of Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF); he came to be married to Archana, daughter of Sri Vinod Dubey, on 31 January 2013. After marriage, wife of A-1 started living at the matrimonial house at village Merhi Dudhi, Tehsil, Bharthana, district Etawah. A-1, at intervals, used to visit his native village on leave being sanctioned by the CRPF. From the wedlock, corpus was born on 02 October 2016, at Etawah. In the process of delivery, Archana’s physical condition became critical, she was shifted to Intensive Care Unit (I.C.U.), and was diagnosed of cardiac disorder by the attending
Ather Hussain Versus Syed Siraj Ahmad
Dr. Veena Kapoor vs. Varinder Kumar Kapoor
Gaurav Nagpal Versus Sumedha Nagpal
Gaytri Bajaj Versus Jiten Bhalla
Gohar Begum vs. Suggi @ Nazma Begum and others
Kirtikumar Maheshankar Joshi vs. Pradipkumar Karunashanker Joshi
Mamta Versus Ashok Jagannath Bharuka
Mausami Moitra Ganguli vs. Jayanti Ganguli
Rajiv Bhatia vs. Government of NCT of Delhi and others
Rosy Jacob vs. Jacob A. Chakramakkal
Sura Reddy Versus Chenna Reddy
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.