SHEKHAR KUMAR YADAV
Kapil Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner/Chairman, Meerut Devp. Authority Meerut – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Shekhar Kumar Yadav, J.
1. To assail correctness of the order dated 18.07.2019 passed in appeal and order dated 29.08.2019 passed in review application passed by Commissioner/Chairman, Meerut Region Meerut, Meerut Development Authority, District Meerut respondent no.1 and order dated 23.06.2018 passed by Vice Chairman, Meerut Development Authority, District Meerut respondent no.2 (Annexure Nos.22, 19 and 14 respectively), this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been preferred.
2. In a nutsell, the case of the petitioner is that he was appointed as Clerk in the office of Meerut Development Authority in the year 1983. On 17.08.2018, one Sri Baijnath posted as Additional Secretary, Meerut Development Authority lodged a complaint (Annexure No.1 to the writ petition) in Police Station Meerut at about 11.30 a.m. alleging that when the officers of the authority were busy in meeting, at that time, some of the members of the Meerut Development Authority Employees Union (hereinafter referred to as the “Union”) entered into the office and started shouting slogan and also misbehaved with the officers, as a result of which, work was hampered about half an
O.K. Bhardwaj vs. Union of India (2001) 9 SCC 180
Food Corporation of India vs. A . Prahalada Rao (2001) 1 SCC 165
State of Bombay vs. Gajanaj Mahadev Badley
Managing Director ECIL Hyderabad vs. B Karunakar
State of U.P. and another vs. T.P. Lal Srivastava
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.