RAJ BEER SINGH
Gauransh (Minor) – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This habeas corpus writ petition has been filed by seeking following reliefs:
ii. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Habeas Corpus and permit the petitioner to meet his son twice in a month, so that justice may be done.
iii. Issue any suitable order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case, so that justice may be done.
iii. Award the cost of the petition in favour of the petitioners.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
3. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioner no.2 is father of petitioner no.1 Gauransh (minor)/corpus and that he is in the custody of respondent no.4, who is mother of the said corpus. The corpus is aged only about five years. There is matrimonial dispute between petitioner no.2 and his wife/respondent no.4 and the petitioner No. 2 is payi
Elizabeth Dinshaw v. Arvand M. Dinshaw
Kanu Sanyal v. District Magistrate, Darjeeling, (1973) 2 SCC 674
Nithya Anand Raghvan v State (NCT of Delhi) and another 2017 8 SCC 454
Sayed Saleemuddin vs. Dr. Rukhsana and others (2001)5 SCC 247
Tejaswini Gaud and others vs. Shekhar Jagdish Prasad Tewari and others (2019) 7 SCC 42
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.