Ram Kinkar Singh vs State of U. P. - 2023 Supreme(All) 2596

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(All) 2596

SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY
Ram Kinkar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner:Sri Sachida Nand Tripathi, Arun Kumar Pandey, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Sri Jitendra Kumar Srivastava and Sri A.K.Rai, ACSC.

JUDGMENT

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery, J.

Heard Sri Sachida Nand Tripathi, Arun Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for petitioner, Sri Jitendra Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for respondents no.5, 6 and 7 and Sri A.K.Rai, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel.

2. In present case, proceedings under Section 21 of Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 (hereinafter called the 'Act of 1953') were initiated in pursuance of publication of Provisional Consolidation Scheme under Section 20 of Act of 1953, wherein the Consolidation Officer has considered objections filed by petitioner as well as respondents. Objections filed by Ram Nath (father of respondent nos.10 and 12) were allowed, whereas objections filed by Raj Bahadur, respondent no.5 and the petitioner (Ram Kiran Singh) were allowed in part. Ram Prasad and Raj Bahadur, (respondents no.4 and 5 herein) have filed Appeals before the Settlement Officer of Consolidation inter-alia on following grounds:

^^3& ;g fd vihydrkZx.k ds vk0ua0 362 ds iwohZ fgLls esa eRL; ikyu gsrq uo QhV xgjk rkykc gS tks orZeku pdcanh izfdz;k ds varxZr pd ckgj dj fn;k x;k gSA ftl rkykc ds if'peh fgLls dh tehu jkefdadj o fo'oukFk vkfn ds pdksa esa lek;