SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(All) 288

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. 
Veena Menon - Petitioner
Versus
State of U.P. And  Others - Respondents
WRIT - A No. - 15328 of 2025
Decided On : 03-04-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Himanshu Bansal, Shivam Yadav
For the Respondent: C.S.C.

Fraudulent documentation undermines claims for educational qualifications, disallowing entitlement effects from misrepresentation; courts emphasize integrity in certification processes.

Headnote:(A) Statutory Authority - Examination Regulations of the Uttar Pradesh Board of Secondary Education - Fraudulent Documentation - Petitioner challenged rejection of High School certificate and salary withholding orders, claiming valid qualifications based on Gazette publication identifying her name. Court noted that foundational documents were forged, lacking authenticity and leading to certification denial. (Paras 42, 47, 112)

(B) Natural Justice - Vitiation by Fraud - Petitioner’s reliance on fabricated documents and long service history cannot nullify basis for fraud; no entitlement arises from actions rooted in misrepresentation. (Paras 102, 110)

(C) Procedural Irregularity - Delayed Submission - Authorities' actions scrutinized for compliance; however, substantial illegality rendered participant’s rights unenforceable. (Paras 103, 114)

Facts of the case:
Petitioner claimed issuance of Marksheet based on gazette indication amidst allegations of submitted documents being fraudulent, having been appointed as teacher using alleged certificates contrary to rules and obtained certifications leading to service benefits. (Paras 1 - 2, 23, 35)

Findings of Court:
Impugned orders were justified in law; substantial evidence of fraud and fabrication surfaced, indicating that claims were insubstantial owing to acquisition through deceitful means. (Paras 77, 112)

Issues: Determination if refusal of certifications based on foundational fraud was justifiable; whether the tenure served computed valid past entitlements in light of discovered malfeasance. (Paras 22, 23)

Ratio Decidendi: Relying on fraudulent documents undermines the basis of academic achievements; certification issues are deemed validly denied when substantive fraud is proven. (Paras 76, 112)

Result: Writ petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. writ petition filed against withholding of educational documents. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. petitioner's appointment and educational qualifications established. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 12)
3. legal basis for restoring educational records. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
4. arguments challenging validity of withheld certificates. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
5. inquiry into the validity of petitioner's claims. (Para 41 , 42 , 44 , 45 , 46)
6. court's observation on evidence supporting the alleged fraud. (Para 70 , 72 , 74 , 76 , 82)
7. fraud vitiates legal foundations of employment claims. (Para 93 , 100 , 108 , 110)
8. final dismissal of writ petition. (Para 114 , 115 , 116)

JUDGMENT :

MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J.

1. Mr. Himanshu Bansal, learned Advocate has appeared on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Shailendra Singh, learned Standing Counsel appeared for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred instant writ petition challenging orders dated 26.07.2025, 13.08.2025 passed by the Additional Secretary, Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad, Meerut Region and the consequential orders dated 19.08.2025 and 20.08.2025 passed by the District Basic Education Officer, Meerut. The petitioner has further prayed for the direction upon the respondents to forthwith release the withheld salary of the petitioner along with all consequential benefits including arrears and continuity of service. It has further been prayed that the respondents may be directed to issue High School Marksheet and Passing Certificate of the petitioner in terms of the Gazette Notification of 1984 wherein the petitioner’s name is recorded at Serial No. 725.

3. Placing brief facts of the case, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was appointed way back in the year 1989 as an Assistant Teacher in Chruch City Junior High School, Thatherwada, District Meerut and served up to the satisfaction of her superiors and there has been no complaint against her. At the time of appointment the educational documents submitted by her including High School Marksheet of the year 1984 (Roll no. 1233725) issued by St. Thomas Girls Inter College, Meerut were duly verified. Till date mark sheets of class 10th and class 12th as well as TET of the petitioner were not disputed and they still hold good ground in the eyes of law.

4. The controversy arose when the petitioner had to upload all details of her employment along with the documents of educational qualifications on Manav Sampada Portal as per requirements of the respondents. While doing so, the petitioner realized that Passing Certificate of High School was also required to be uploaded. The aforesaid certificate was withheld by Madhyamik Shiksha Board in the year 1984 due to non-submission of some papers and there was no requirement of any such certificate, therefore, the petitioner did not apply for Class-X passing certificate, however the handwritten marksheet of class 10th duly certified by the Principal of the School from where she had completed her Class-X was made available to her. Thus for uploading Class-X certificate as required by the respondent authorities, the petitioner approached Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad, Regional Office, Meerut requesting for issuance of marksheet and passing certificate of High School bearing roll no. 1233725 from St. Thomas Girls Inter College, Meerut, by means of moving an application dated 20.03.2024. On 30.08.2024 the Regional Secretary, Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad, Meerut Region, informed the petitioner that as the result of High School Examination 1984 (Roll No. 1233725) was shown as ‘withheld’ on the ground that entry of her name in the admission register and Transfer Certificate of Class-IX had not been submitted by the institution. It was further mentioned that in terms of resolution of the Examination Committee dated 23.10.2019, the results of such candidates would remain withheld unless the requisite documents were furnished within two years and thereafter will be released on the orders of Sec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top