KAUSHAL JAYENDRA THAKER, SUBHASH CHAND
Raj Kumar Singh Bhadouria – Appellant
Versus
Satya Mohan Pandey – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Ref: Civil Misc. Review Application No.139896 of 2012)
1. By way of this Review Application, appellant, Raj Kumar Singh Bhadouria has sought review of the judgment and order dated 13.04.2012 passed by this Court (Coram: Justice Sheo Kumar Singh and Justice Ram Surat Ram (Maurya)) in First Appeal From Order No. 1046 of 2012 (Raj Kumar Singh Bhadouria Vs. Satya Mohan Pandey and another).
2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the review-applicant that the Court has not properly appreciated the matter and judgment is not correct.
3. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner (review) and gone through the grounds taken in the Review Application, we find that virtually there is an attempt to re-argue the matter which is not permissible in a Review Application. An application for review cannot be treated to be an opportunity to argue the case on merits afresh. In the garb of a review application reargument on merits of the case cannot be allowed. We are even fortified in our view by the following authoritative pronouncements.
4. In Thungabhadra Industries Ltd. Vs. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, AIR 1964 SC 1372 the Court said :
Thungabhadra Industries Ltd. Vs. The Government of Andhra Pradesh
Aribam Tuleshwar Sharma Vs. Aribam Pishak Sharma
Parsion Devi and others Vs. Sumitri Devi and others
Lily Thomas Vs. Union of India
Kamlesh Verma Vs. Mayawati and others
Moran Mar Basselios Catholicos vs. Most Rev. Mar Poulose Athanasius & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.