NEERAJ TIWARI
Raju – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned standing counsel for respondent No. 1 and Ms. Pooja Agarwal, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 2 to 5.
2. Pleadings are exchanged between the parties. With the consent of parties, writ petition is being decided at the admission stage itself.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that High Court of judicature at Allahabad has issued advertisement for recruitment of Group 'C' post in the U.P. Civil Court Staff Centralized Recruitment Scheme-2014, (Advertisement No. 1/Sub. Court/Category 'C'/Clerical Cadre/2014). He further pointed out that as per Point No. 9 of General Instruction, all the candidates, who are already in Central/State Government Service or in any Central/State Government undertaking or in any type of other organization established and governed by the Central/State Government, shall have to produce no objection certificate (N.O.C.) as and when called for. Petitioner, being fully eligible for the said post, has submitted application form and ultimately after going through the due procedure
High Court of Madhya Pradesh vs. Satya Narain Jhavar
Om Prakash Mann vs. Director of Education (Basic) and other (2006) 7 SCC 558
Samsher Singh vs. State of Punjab and another
State of Punjab and others vs. Balbir Singh
State of Punjab v. Dharam Singh
State of U.P. vs. Akbar Ali Khan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.