Judgment :

Petitioner is aggrieved and challenges order of respondent no.5 bearing No. D.II.1/2002-GC-EC.II dated 27th April 2002 whereby, services of petitioner have been terminated w.e.f. 27-04-2002. Before adverting to grounds on which order impugned has been assailed, it would be apposite to refer to the brief resume of the factual antecedents leading to passing of order impugned by respondent No.5.

2. Respondents vide order dated May 2001 selected and appointed petitioner as constable (GD) in CRPF after the petitioner qualified all the tests including the physical standard test. Petitioner was also checked by Board of Doctors and was found physically fit by the respondents and was sent for undergoing training at Group Centre CRPF Khatkhati Assam. Petitioner was allotted number 01507064, completed 16 weeks training and the 17th week was started, however, during the training period respondents vide order impugned dated 27-04-2002 terminated services of petitioner under Sub-Rule (I) of Rule IV of CCS (Temporary Service) Rules 1965 without assigning any reason,