Kaushal Kishore Chaubey vs State Of U. P.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(All) 1110

SARAL SRIVASTAVA
Kaushal Kishore Chaubey – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Syed Wajid Ali
For the Respondent: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri Syed Wajid Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Ms. Monika Arya, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents.

2. The petitioners, through the present writ petition, have prayed for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to grant pension and other retiral benefits to them.

3. The petitioners, who are five in numbers, were engaged as Seasonal Collection Amin on different dates in Tehsil Sadar, District Maharajganj. Their services were regularized and all of them have retired. The details of all the petitioners in respect of their date of engagement, regularization, and retirement are given in the table below:-

Sl. No.	Name of petitioners	Date of Engagement	Date of Regularizati on	Date of Retirement
1.	Kaushal Kishore Chaubey	05.07.1 976	31.05.20 12	31.05.201 8
2.	Nar Singh	20.03.1 984	23.12.20 11	31.01.201 8
3.	Ravindra Kumar Dubey	29.08.1 989	25.10.20 16	20.09.201 9
4.	Madan Prasad	03.02.1 990	24.12.20 11	31.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2021 Supreme(All) 1110

SARAL SRIVASTAVAKaushal Kishore Chaubey – AppellantVersusState Of U. P. – Respondent

Cases Referred (7)

SARAL SRIVASTAVA
Kaushal Kishore Chaubey – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent