VIVEK CHAUDHARY
Shyam Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Ayush Civil Secrt. Lko. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners Sri Vivek Sirswal, Sri Rakesh Kumar Singh, Sri Angrej Nath Shukla, Km. Pratima Devi, Sri Vivek Kumar Rai, Sri Jitendra Kumar Pandey, Sri Lalji Yadav, Sri Manendra Nath Rai, Sri Fahmid Ahmad, Sri Mohd. Ateeq Khan, Sri Suneel Kumar Singh Kalhans, Sri Shobh Nath Pandey, Sri Sudeep Kumar, Sri Ramesh Kumar Srivastava, Sri Mohd. Tauseef Siddiqui, Sri Pradeep Kumar Shukla, Sri Yogesh Chandra Srivastava, Sri Jai Bahadur Singh, Sri Mrinal Tripathi, Sri Nirankar Singh, Sri Ashok Kumar Mishra, Sri Vimal Kumar, Km. Vishwa Mohini, Sri Ashwani Kumar, Sri Arvind Pratap Singh, Sri V.K. Shukla, Sri Aditya Vikram Shahi, Sri Vinod Kumar Singh, Sri Mukesh Kumar, Sri Digvijay Singh Yadav, Sri Pradip Kumar Srivastava, Sri Lalendra Pratap Singh, Sri. A.P. Singh, Sri Satish Kumar Sharma and Sri Praful Yadav, learned Standing Counsel for the State.
2. This Bunch of writ petitions relates to interpretation and application of Section 2 of the Act of 2021 for counting qualifying service for the purpose of pension with regard to work charge employees, daily wager employees, adhoc appointees against the post as well as Seasonal Collection Amin. Since common
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.