IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Rajesh Singh Chauhan, J.
Mohd. Nijamuddin & Others - Petitioner
Vs.
State Of U.P.Thru.Prin.Secy.Deptt. Of Home & Anr. - Respondent
Service Single No.29369 of 2016, 2397 of 2020
Decided On : 21-09-2021
U.P. Pradeshik Armed Constabulary Act, 1948 - Section 15 and 6 - U.P. Police Radio Subordinate Service Rules, 1982 - Vacancies as shown in the chart of vacancies of the various Posts of department - Promotion on the post of Workshop - Promotion on the post of Workshop Hand in Uttar Pradesh Police Radio Branch Headquarters, Lucknow (vacancies occurring prior to the year 2016 can be made on the basis of Uttar Pradesh Police Radio Subordinate Service (Second Amendment) Rules, 2016 or in view of provisions of Uttar Pradesh Police Radio - .P. Police Radio Branch of the Police Force, Governor of U.P. in exercise of powers vested in him under Section 15 of U.P. Pradeshik Armed Constabulary Act, 1948 promulgated the U.P. Police Radio Subordinate Service Rules, 1982 regulating the appointment and other conditions of service of the posts in the U.P. Police Radio Subordinate Service. According to Rule 4 of the aforesaid Rules, the cadre of the U.P. Police Radio Subordinate Service would comprise of the posts of Workshop Hand, Assistant Operator, Head Operator, Radio Station Officer, Radio Maintenance Officer and Radio Inspector in that hierarchy – Held, Court having regard to the purport and object sought to be achieved by the legislature may construe the word “substitution” as an “amendment” having a prospective effect – Court do not think that it is a universal rule that the word “substitution” necessarily or always connotes two severable steps, that is to say, one of repeal and another of a fresh enactment even if it implies two steps - General meaning is to be given effect to, unless it is found that the legislature intended otherwise - First Rules i.e. Rules, 1982 and qualification so inserted by means qualifications indicated under such Rules i.e. Rules, 2016 are not ousting the petitioners from consideration zone of promotion on post of Workshop Hand and such Rules, 2016 are governing the field for all practical purposes, therefore, the opposite parties are directed to make promotion on the post of Workshop Hand identifying entire existing vacancies in the promotional quota completing such exercise with expedition, preferably within a period of three months thereby promoting all suitable candidates from Class-IV post to post of Workshop Hand strictly in accordance with Rules, 2016 - Writ petitions are disposed of.
JUDGMENT :
Rajesh Singh Chauhan, J.
1. Heard Sri A.P. Singh, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri Amrendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners in leading writ petition as well as Sri I.M. Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners in Service Single No.2397 of 2020, Sri Sharad, learned Standing Counsel for the State, Sri Amit Bose, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Sri Abhishek Bose, learned counsel for the intervenor.
2. By means of first writ petition, only one prayer has been made, which is as under:-
3. By means of second writ petition, following prayers have been made:-
2. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Opposite Parties to consider the Petitioners for promotion on the post of Workshop Hand under Rule -5(1)(a) read with rule 17 of U.P. Police Radio Subordinate Service Rules-2015 as amended by U.P. Police Radio Subordinate Service (IInd Amendment) Rules 2016, against the existing vacancies as shown in the chart of vacancies of the various posts of department as on 31.08.2019 contained in annexure no. 5 to the writ petition excluding the vacancies which had been ascertained prior to U.P. Police Radio Subordinate Service (IInd Amendment) Rules 2016 i.e. 19.10.2016 (the date of notification no.18/2016/2792/6-Pu-01-16-1300 (7)/ 1994 whereby the U.P. Police Radio Subordinate Service (IInd Amendment) Rules 2016 were notified) within a short reasonable period to be prescribed by this Hon'ble Court in the interest of Justice."
4. In both the writ petitions since the question of law to be adjudicated is one and same, therefore, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties I hereby dispose of both the writ petition by means of common order.
5. The question to be adjudicated in both the writ petitions is that as to whether the promotion on the post of Workshop Hand in Uttar Pradesh Police Radio Branch Headquarters, Lucknow (hereinafter referred to as "department in question") for the vacancies occurring prior to the year 2016 can be made on the basis of Uttar Pradesh Police Radio Subordinate Service (Second Amendment) Rules, 2016 or in view of the provisions of Uttar Pradesh Police Radio
6. Ignoring the detailed facts of the issue in question, only those facts are being considered which are necessary to adjudicate the issue in question.
7. In both the writ petitions, the petitioners were initially appointed on the post of Messenger Peon/Group 'D' post from the year 1989 to 1993. Later on, all the petitioners were confirmed on such post and have been allowed all service benefits admissible as per law e.g. selection grade, promotional pay scale, benefit of A.C.P. etc.
8. Notably, for the U.P. Police Radio Branch of the Police Force, the Governor of U.P. in exercise of powers vested in him under Section 15 of the U.P. Pradeshik Armed Constabulary Act, 1948 (hereinaf
Md. Raisul Islam & Ors. v. Gokul Mohan Hazarika & Ors.
Santosh Kumar Singh v. State of U.P. and others
Gaurav Pradhan & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors
Ramjit Singh Kardam v. Sanjeev Kumar
Union of India & Others v. Krishna Kumar
Deepak Agarwal and Another v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others
State of Tripura and others Vs. Nikhil Ranjan Chakraborty and others
Y.V. Rangaiah v. J. Sreenivasa Rao
K. Ramulu v. S. Suryaprakash Rao
Union of India and Others v. Krishna Kumar and Others
State of Orissa and Another v. Dhirendra Sundar Das and Others
Zile Singh v. State of Haryana and Others
West U.P. Sugar Mills Assn. vs. State of U.P.
State of Rajasthan v. Mangilal Pindwal
when a new post is created, the concept of Rules obtaining when the vacancies arose is inappiicable as what is created is a new post on account of re-structuring of the cadre.
The right to consideration for promotion is governed by the rules in effect at the time of consideration, not those in place when vacancies arose.
Recruitment - plea raised by the petitioners is fallacious - As mere acquiring of qualification at a relevant point of time cannot give rise to an expectation, much less, legitimate expectation of ap....
Vacancies arising under older rules are not necessarily filled by those rules when new recruitment rules have been promulgated, barring vested rights.
The amendment affecting chances of promotion for employees does not necessarily constitute a change in the conditions of service, and the State has the power to unilaterally amend service rules.
The court upheld the validity of amended promotion rules, ruling they apply prospectively and that participation in the selection process waives the right to challenge it.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.