MANJU RANI CHAUHAN
Aditya Pandey – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Civil Misc. Amendment Application No.3 of 2022.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner filed the amendment application to add prayer No. (ii-A) and (ii-B) in the prayer clause.
2. As no objection has been raised by learned counsel for the respondents, this amendment application is allowed.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to incorporate the necessary amendment in the body of the petition within three days.
Order on Petition
1. Heard Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Manish Goel, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr. Vikram Bahadur Yadav, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
2. Initially, the instant petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:-
(ii) a writ, order or direction, in the nature of
Asha Vs. Pt. B.D. Sharma University of Health Science and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.