PANKAJ BHATIA
Shivani Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Pankaj Bhatia, J.
1. Heard Ms. Anupama Bhadauria, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Sanjay Bhasin, assisted by Mr. Kshitiz Mishra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.4, Mr. Piyush Kumar, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State and Mr. Gyanendra Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondent no.3 and Mr. Amrendra Singh Yadav holding brief of Mr. Amit Jaiswal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no.6/College.
2. The present petition has been filed seeking refund of the deposit of Rs.13,30,000/-along with interest paid by the petitioner to the respondent no.4 towards fees and security deposit.
3. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioner, in brief, is that the petitioner appeared in National Eligibility Entrance Test (NEET) of the year 2018 and secured the rank 333095 for the course of M.B.B.S. It is stated that after the first round of counseling the petitioner deposited Rs.2,00,000/-by means of a demand draft in favour of the opposite party no.4 on 22.06.2018 as security deposit. It is also state
Ashish Ranjan vs. Union of India & Ors. [(2016) 11 SCC 225]
Bishambhar Dayal Chandra Mohan and others Vs. State of U.P. and others; (1982) 1 SCC 39
Bombay Dyeing & Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Vs. State of Bombay and others; AIR 1958 SC 328
Fateh Chand v. Balkishan Dass -AIR 1963 SC 1405
Hindustan Times and others Vs. State of U.P. and another; (2003) 1 SCC 591
Khem Chand Vs.Union of India and others; AIR 1963 SC 687
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.