IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
KAUSHAL JAYENDRA THAKER, AJAI TYAGI, JJ.
Balveer Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 2600 of 2018
Decided On : 02-11-2022
Murder - Indian Penal Code - Section 302 - [FACT OF THE CASE] The accused was convicted under Section 302 of IPC for shooting the deceased over a dispute involving Rs. 100. The prosecution's evidence and medical reports indicated the accused's guilt. [FINDING OF THE COURT] The court found the accused guilty of causing the death of the deceased and considered whether the conviction should be upheld or converted to Section 304 Part-I or Part-II of the Indian Penal Code. [ISSUES] The court considered the intention and knowledge of the accused in causing death and the distinction between 'murder' and 'culpable homicide not amounting to murder'. [RATIO DECIDENDI] The court concluded that the offence was punishable under Section 304 Part-I of IPC, considering the absence of premeditation and the accused's lack of intention to cause death. [FINAL DECISION] The court partly allowed the appeal, converting the conviction to Section 304 Part-I of IPC and sentencing the accused to eight years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 10,000. The accused, in jail since 14.1.2016, would be released on completion of eight years with remission, and the judgment and order were modified accordingly.
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Abhishek Mayank, learned counsel for appellant and Sri Vikas Goswami, learned counsel for State.
2. This appeal has been preferred by the accused-appellant against the judgment and order dated 17.4.2018, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 10, Aligarh in Sessions Trial No. 241 of 2016 (State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Balveer Singh ) connected with Sessions Trial No. 242 of 2016 arising out of Crime No. 261 of 2015 connected with Crime No. 05 of 2016 convicting the accused – appellant under Sections 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in brevity 'IPC'), Police Station Dadon, District Aligarh and sentenced the accused-appellant to undergo imprisonment for life with fine of Rs.20,000/- and in case of default of payment of fine, further to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months.
3. The prosecution story in brief is as follows, that on getting the information, it was scribed by Rajendra Singh s/o Har Prasad, Ext.Ka- 1 written-complaint was submitted in police-station Dadon, District Aligarh by the complainant Itwari Singh s/o Neksey r/o Ramnagar P.S.-Ramnagar P.S.-Dadon District-Aligarh on 18.11.2015 wherein it was mentioned that “Today on 18.11.2015, my brother Kundan aged around 45 years was sitting at his home and Balveer Singh s/o Bhurey Singh, son of my father’s elder brother, was also present there. My brother had borrowed Rs.100/- from Balveer Singh, over the return of which, a dispute arose between Balveer Singh and Kundan. On hearing hue and cry, when my wife Smt. Manoj Devi and he came out of the room, Balveer Singh son of my father’s elder brother shot my brother Kundan in my presence and my wife at 9 p.m. and ran away. While running away, Balveer Singh took away the tamancha (country made gun) with him. On raising alarm by me, people from the surrounding area gathered there, who saw Balveer Singh running away. The information of the occurrence was conveyed on Number- 100. My brother’s dead body is lying at the spot. Please take appropriate action by lodging my report.”
4. On the basis of First Information Report, Itwri Singh’s and also written-complaint, case crime no. 261 of 2015 u/s 302 IPC against Balveer Singh was registered in police-station Dadon. Entry of the case was made in the concerned G.D. of the police-station. During the investigation, Ext.Ka-7 inquest-report was prepared by taking, the dead body of deceased Kundan in custody of police and dead body of the deceased was sent for post-mortem.
5. During the investigation, accused Balveer was arrested by Incharge of police-station Dadon on 13.01.2016 and on being frisked, one country-made pistol 315 bore and one live cartridge were recovered from Balveer.
6. During investigation, the investigator inspected the place of occurrence and prepared the site plan Ext. ka-11 & ka-14 and recorded the statements of the witnesses. After investigation, the investigator finding the prima facie case under section- 302 IPC & Section-25 Arms Act against the accused namely Balveer Singh submitted charge sheet Ext. ka-16 & ka-15 respectively in both cases.
7. On completion of investigation, charge-sheet u/s 302 I.P.C. against the accused was filed. The cognizance was taken on the charge-sheet by the concerned Magistrate and the case was committed to the court of session under section 302 of I.P.C.
8. On being summoned, the accused-appellant pleaded not guilty and wanted to be tried, hence, the trial commenced and the prosecution examined about 11 witnesses who are as follows:
| 1 | Deposition of Manoj Devi | PW-1 |
| 2 | Deposition of Rajendra | PW-2 |
| 3 | Deposition of Rajnesh alias Kallu | PW-3 |
| 4 | Deposition of Satveer | PW-4 |
| 5 | Deposition of Itwari Singh | PW-5 |
| 6 | Deposition of constable Amar Singh | PW-6 |
| 7 | Deposition of S.I. Ramkant Pachauri | PW-7 |
| 8 | Deposition of Dr. Ikrar Ahmad | PW-8 |
| 9 | Depo | |
B.N. Kavatakar and Another Vs. State of Karnataka
Guru Basavraj vs State of Karnataka
Jameel vs. State of U.P. (2010) 12 SCC 532
Mohd. Giasuddin Vs. State of A.P. AIR 1977 SC 1926
Pravat Chandra Mohanty v. State of Odisha
Ravada Sasikala vs. State of A.P. AIR 2017 SC 1166
The distinction between 'murder' and 'culpable homicide not amounting to murder' under Section 299 and 300 of IPC, and the application of the reformative theory of punishment in sentencing.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the distinction between 'murder' and 'culpable homicide not amounting to murder' under the Indian Penal Code, and the emphasis on the reformative a....
The court established that the distinction between murder and culpable homicide hinges on the intent and premeditation of the accused.
The distinction between 'murder' and 'culpable homicide not amounting to murder' under Sections 299 and 300 of IPC, and the application of the reformative theory of punishment in determining the appr....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the distinction between 'murder' and 'culpable homicide not amounting to murder' under Section 299 and 300 of IPC, and the applicability of Section....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of the dying declaration, the determination of the nature of the offense, and the application of the appropriate section of the ....
The distinction between culpable homicide and murder was clarified, emphasizing the need for proportionality in sentencing within the reformative justice framework.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of the principles to distinguish between 'murder' and 'culpable homicide not amounting to murder' under IPC, and the consideration ....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.