SHAMIM AHMED
Utkarsh Awasthi – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Criminal Misc. Delay Condonation Application No. 01 of 2022)
1. This criminal appeal has been filed with a delay of 2300 days, as per the report of the stamp reporter.
2. By means of present criminal appeal, the appellant/complainant has challenged the impugned judgment and order dated 15.02.2014 passed by learned Additional District and Session Judge, Court No.3, Sitapur, convicting and sentencing the respondents No. 2 to 6 under Sections 147/148/34, 325/149/34, 427/149/34, 436/427/34, 323/149/34 I.P.C. for a maximum punishment of five years with default stipulation in Session Trial No. 437 2007, arising out of Crime No. 134/2002 relating to Police Station Reusa, District Sitapur and acquitting them from the charges framed against them under Sections 307, 504, 506 I.P.C.
3. Heard Sri Nitin Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri Aniruddh Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A.-1 for the State and perused the record.
4. Learned counsel for the appellant/applicant submits that the respondent Nos. 2 to 6 are the criminal spirited persons in which Basant Lal, Arvind Pandey, Shobha Ram Pandey and Amrit Lal Pandey have criminal history and they are likely to create disturbanc
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.