J. J. MUNIR
Prem Singh – Appellant
Versus
Additional District and Sessions Judge/Spl. Judge-3, Gorakhpur – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
This writ petition has been filed by Prem Singh, now deceased and represented by his heirs and LRs, assailing two orders of release, passed under Section 21(1)(a) of The Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 (U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972) (for short, ''the Act'), relating to two distinct tenements in House No. C/105/119, Tehsil Sadar, District Gorakhpur. The orders of release passed separately by the Prescribed Authority relating to both the tenements in House No. 105/119 (supra), for short, 'the house in question', have been affirmed in two separate appeals by the Appellate Authority, under Section 22 of the Act, both the appeals being preferred by Prem Singh.
2. The facts leading to this writ petition are these: Smt. Uma Shukla, mentioned in the cause title of the writ petition as Smt. Uma Devi Shukla, wife of Basant Shukla, instituted two separate proceedings under Section 21(1)(a) of the Act against two different tenants, occupying different parts of the house in question. P.A. Case No. 37 of 2013 was instituted by Smt. Uma Shukla (for short, 'the landlady') against Smt. Prabhawati Devi widow of the late Seeta, Shrawan and Gopal,
Smt. Kalpana Gulati and others v. 8th Addl. D.J. Allahabad and others
Izhaar Ali and another v. Prescribed Authority/J.S.C.C., Sitapur and others
Modi Spinning and Weaving Mills Co. Ltd. v. Ladha Ram and Company
Vishwanath Agrawal v. Savitri Bera
Martin & Harris Ltd. v. VIth Additional Distt. Judge and others
Vellayan Chettiar v. Govt. of the Province of Madras
Dhirendra Nath Gorai v. Sudhir Chandra Ghosh
A landlord's bona fide need for premises does not require proof of dire necessity, and tenants must demonstrate efforts to find alternative accommodation to establish greater hardship.
A tenant waives the right to contest the maintainability of a release application if objections are not raised timely, and the landlord's need for the property is determined to be bona fide.
Point of law : Since there is no bar under law upon the landlord in filing the release application, for which he is not even required to serve a notice under Section 21 of the Act of 1972 upon the te....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.