SHAMIM AHMED
X (Minor) – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This revision is directed against the judgment and order dated 21.02.2022 passed by Special Judge POCSO Act/Additional District and Session Judge, Varanai dismissing Criminal Appeal No.17 of 2022 (Vishal Yadav versus State of U.P.) filed under Section 101 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (for short ‘the Act’) and affirming the order dated 15.01.2022 passed by Juvenile Justice Board, Varanasi refusing the bail plea to the revisionist in Case Crime No. 195 of 2020, under Sections 147, 149, 302, 307, 323, 324, 354 and 506 I.P.C. Police Station Lohta, District Varanasi.
2. Sri Diwan Saifullah Khan, learned counsel for the opposite party No.2 submits that he does not want to file counter affidavit. Learned A.G.A. has also not filed counter affidavit.
3. Heard Sri Birendra Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the revisionist as well as Sri Vinod Kant, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Sri Viabhav Aaanad, learned A.G.A. for the State, Sri Diwan Saifullah Khan, learned counsel for the opposite party No.2 and perused the record.
4. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that the revisionist is named in the F.I.R. allegedly lodged
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.