JUDGMENT :

SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J.

1. Heard Sri. Vivek Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the revisionist and Sri. Manoj Kumar Dwivedi learned A.G.A. for the State. Despite the service of notice, no one has appeared for opposite party no. 2.

2. The Present Criminal Revision has been preferred under Section 102 of The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as “JJ Act, 2015”) against the judgment dated 2.4.2021 passed by Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge POCSO Act, Bagpat, in Criminal Appeal No. 13 of 2020, whereby the appellate court has rejected the Criminal appeal and affirmed the order dated 24.2.2021 passed by Juvenile Justice Board, Bagpat. The Juvenile Justice Board has rejected the bail application of the revisionist, which has been filed by his natural guardian/father, under Section 12 of “JJ Act, 2015” in Misc. Case No. 13 of 2020 arising out of Case Crime No. 117 of 2020 under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (in short “I.P.C.”) Police Station Baraut, District Bagpat.

3. Being aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 2.4.2021 and 24.2.2021 passed by the Appellate Court as well as the Juvenile Justice Board, the revisioni