SHAMIM AHMED
Yogendra Goswami – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Shamim Ahmed, J.
1. Heard Shri H.N. Singh, Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Abhishek Dwivedi, learned counsel for applicant and Shri Ronak Chaturvedi, learned counsel appearing for opposite party No. 2 and learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the prayer to quash the impugned order dated 13.10.2020 passed by the Additional Judicial Magistrate, Mathura in Complaint Case No. 699 of 2020 (Manoj Kumar Sharma vs. Yogendra Goswami), under Section 138 Negotiable Instrument Act P.S. Vrindavan District Mathura.
3. Shri H.N. Singh, learned Senior Counsel for the applicant has handed over the cheque amount of Rs. 4,50,000.00 by way of bank draft No. 167559 dated 22.2.2021 re-validated on 28.6.2021 to Shri Ronak Chaturvedi, learned counsel for opposite party No. 2 before this Court today itself.
4. Learned counsel for opposite party No. 2 has received the draft of Rs. 4,50,000/- on the instruction of his client Manoj Kumar Sharma and submits that his client is not interested to pursue the case i.e. Complaint Case No. 699 of 2020 (Manoj Kumar Sharma vs. Yogendra Goswami), under Section 138 Negotiable Instrument
Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab
Narendra Singh and Others vs. State of Punjab and Others
Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and Others vs. State of Gujarat and Another
R.P. Kapoor vs. State of Punjab
Yogendra Yadav and Others vs. State of Jharkhand
Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq and Another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.