Back
SHAMIM AHMED
Krishan Kumar Maheshwary – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Shamim Ahmed, J.
Sri. Uday Bhanu Singh, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of the opposite party no.2 by filing vakalatnama, which is taken on record.
2. Heard Shri. Anand Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for applicants, Shri. Uday Bhanu Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned A.G.A., for the State as well as perused the record.
3. This application under section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with the prayer to quash the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.36639 of 2018, Crime No.366 of 2017, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C., Police Station Talkatora, District Lucknow as well as to quash the charge sheet dated 31.03.2018 and summoning order dated 02.06.2018.
4. This Court on 21.05.2024 has passed the following order in Application Under Section 482 No.4620 of 2024:
The High Court can quash criminal proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. if a compromise is reached between parties, provided the case does not involve serious offences.
The court can quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between the parties, considering the nature and gravity of the offence, the impact on society, and the public interest in punishing pers....
The High Court can quash criminal proceedings based on compromise, even if the offence is non-compoundable, in accordance with the settled propositions by the Hon'ble Apex Court.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
