SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 14

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Rajesh Singh Chauhan, J.
Sarvesh Kumar Gupta – Petitioner
Versus
Dr. Neeraj Bora – Respondent
Election Petition No. 9 of 2022
Decided On : 25-01-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Shraddha Tripathi, Pawan Kumar Upadhyay
For the Respondent: Dr. Shailendra Sharma, Anupriya Srivastava, Kaushlendra Yadav, Shitesh Jha

Headnote:

Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 225, 329 (b), 348 (2), 173 – Civil Procedure Code, 1908 – Order VI Rule 15, Order VI Rule 15(4) – Representation of the People Act, 1951 – Section 86 (1), 87 (1), 86, 87, 81, 82, 117, 83 (1) (c), 81 (3) – Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 - Rule 6 (c), 5, 6 – Verification of pleadings - Jurisdiction of existing High Courts – Whether in his possession or power or not – Held, Court held that in normal case defect in pleadings including defect in signing same are curable – Present case is an election petition and Section 81 (3) of RP Act specifically provides for filing an election petition along with copies attested by petitioner – Section 86 of RP Act provides that failure to comply with provisions of section 81 of RP Act would result in rejection of election petition at initial stage and even learned counsel for petitioner has not prayed to correct those defects – Petition is dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

(i) C.M. Application (IA) No.01 of 2022; the objection against the letter dated 07.05.2022 issued by the Hon'ble Registrar dated 07.05.222 in compliance of order dated 27.04.2022 demanding the petitioner to deposit the amount of Rs.94500/-regarding publication of notice of the Election Petition perferred by the petitioner.

(ii) C.M. Application (IA) No.02 of 2022; Application for taking Vakalatnama on record filed by Dr. Shailendra Sharma, learned counsel for the opposite party.

(iii) C.M. Application (IA) No.03 of 2022; Application/preliminary objection for rejection/dismissal of Election Petition No.09 of 2022 on behalf of respondent under Section 86 (1) read with Section 87 (1) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 along with Order VII Rule 11 (a) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908) against the maintainability of the Election Petition.

(iv) C.M. Application (IA) No.04 of 2022; Application for taking of reply of objection filed by the Respondent.

1. Heard Ms. Shraddha Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Dr. Shailendra Sharma, learned counsel for the sole respondent/ opposite party.

2. By means of the present election petition, the petitioner has prayed that the election of Assembly Constituency 172 Lucknow, North of returned candidate Dr. Neeraj Bora, the opposite party, which was declared on 10.03.2022 may be declared as void and set aside. Consequential order may also be passed in the interest of justice.

3. On the first date of admission, on 27.04.2022 this Court has passed the following order:-

"Heard Ms. Shraddha Tripathi, learned counsel for the election petitioner.

Issue notice to respondent in terms of Chapter XV-A Rule 5 & 6 of Allahabd High Court Rules.

Steps be taken to serve respondent within seven working days.

List after service of notice."

4. Chapter-XV-A of Allahabad High Court Rules, 1952 (here-in-after referred to as the "Rules, 1952") defines special provisions relating to the trial of election petition. Since the notice is issued to the opposite party in terms of Rules 5 & 6 of the Rules,1952, therefore, for convenience, Rules 5 & 6 are being reproduced here-in-below:-

"5. Issue of notice to respondent.-The election petition shall be laid before the Bench so constituted without delay, and unless it is dismissed under subsection (1) of Section 86 of the Act or for being otherwise defective, the Bench may direct issue of notice to the respondent to appear and answer the claim on a date to be specified therein. Such notice shall also direct that if he wishes of put up a defence he shall file his written statement together with a list of all documents, whether in his possession or power or not, upon which he indents to rely as evidence in support of his defence on or before the date fixed; and further, that in default of appearance being entered on or before the date fixed in the notice the election petition may be heard and determined in his absence. The notice shall be in Form No.34-A.

6. Process fee and charges.-(a) Notice for the respondent shall issued by ordinary process and simultaneously by registered post.

(b) Notice of the election petition shall also be simultaneously published in a newspaper selected by the Registrar.

(c) Notices, process fee, charges and [a sum of Rs.250] as an initial deposit on account of the cost of publication in a newspaper shall be supplied by the petitioner within seven days of the order directing notice to issue. In default, the election petition shall be laid before the Bench for orders. The Bench may reject the election petition unless for sufficient cause if grants further time.

(d) Where the cost of publication in a newspaper exceeds Rs.50 the Registrar shall call upon the petitioner to deposit the excess amount in Court within the time to be fixed by him. On failure of the petitioner to deposit such costs, the petition shall be laid before the Bench for such orders as the Bench may think fit. In case the cost of publication is less than R

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

gpt-4

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top