Mohhamad Aslam @ Mohhamad Aslam Raeeni vs Ram Feran @ Ram Feran Pandey

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(All) 1

RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN
Mohhamad Aslam @ Mohhamad Aslam Raeeni – Appellant
Versus
Ram Feran @ Ram Feran Pandey – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : In Person, Mohd.Altaf Mansoor, Tanay Chaudhary
For the Respondent: Rajeiu Kumar Tripathi, Lalta Prasad Misra, Rajeiu Kumar Tripathi

Table of Content
1. election petition submission and compliance. (Para 1 , 3 , 4)
2. objections to the maintainability of the election petition were raised. (Para 2)
3. verification and disclosure must comply with statutory requirements. (Para 5 , 15)
4. defective petition grounds and lack of material particulars. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
5. burden on petitioner to detail corrupt practices. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
6. grounds of appeal centered around verification and non-disclosure of criminal cases. (Para 13)
7. verification requirements and curability of defects. (Para 19 , 21 , 22)
8. case laws cited emphasized verification requirements and criteria for curability. (Para 20 , 27)
9. consequences of non-compliance with verification. (Para 24 , 49)
10. requirements for compliance with section 83. (Para 30 , 33)
11. the election petition is liable to dismissal for non-compliance with statutory verification requirements. (Para 44)
12. final ruling to dismiss the election petition. (Para 50)

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Dr. L.P. Misra, assisted by Sri Rajeiu Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondent on th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2024 Supreme(All) 1

RAJESH SINGH CHAUHANMohhamad Aslam @ Mohhamad Aslam Raeeni – AppellantVersusRam Feran @ Ram Feran Pandey – Respondent

Cases Referred (27)

RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN
Mohhamad Aslam @ Mohhamad Aslam Raeeni – Appellant
Versus
Ram Feran @ Ram Feran Pandey – Respondent