IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
SUNEET KUMAR, VIKRAM D. CHAUHAN, JJ.
Kailash - Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. - Respondent
Jail Appeal No. 7728 of 2010 with Criminal Appeal No. 7484 Of 2010
Decided On : 06-01-2023
Indian Penal Code, 1860 -Section 302/34, Section 394, Section 411 - Arms Act - Section 25 - Appeal filed by Appellants challenging judgment and order of conviction and sentence – Whether appeal is maintainable – Held, It is further to be noted that carrying firearm weapon at the place of occurrence is itself indicative of intention of accused person to cause death or such injury as is likely to cause death - Considering the overall circumstances and submissions of learned counsel for the Appellants, learned A.G.A. for the State and after going through the evidence and lower court record, Court is unable to persuade ourselves in taking a different opinion from that of trial court – Appeals dismissed
JUDGMENT :
[Vikram D. Chauhan, J.]
1. Heard Sri Gagan Pratap Singh, learned Amicus Curiae for the Appellant in Jail Appeal No.7728 of 2010 and Sri Anadi Krishna Narayana, learned counsel for the Appellant in Criminal Appeal No.7484 of 2010 and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
2. The present appeal is filed by Appellants challenging judgment and order dated 20th October, 2010 passed by the Special Judge (DAA), Agra. By means of impugned judgment, Appellants-Kailash and Baba Thakur @ Prawesh Kumar Singh has been convicted under Section 394 I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo 10 years rigorous imprisonment and Rs.5000/-fine. Further, Appellants have been convicted under Section 302/34 I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment and Rs.10,000/-fine; Appellant-Kailash has also been convicted under Section 411 I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo 2 years rigorous imprisonment; Appellant-Kailash has further been convicted under Section 25 of Arms Act and sentenced to undergo 3 years rigorous imprisonment and Rs.10,000/- fine.
3. The prosecution case as per first information report is that on 23rd June, 2005 at about 6.30 pm, informant (PW1) Babua along with his son Aslam (PW2) were going to tempo stand Mantola road to meet informant's second son Arif. When they reached near Subhash Road then one cloth agent Amar Nath (PW4) made distress call that his belongings have been taken away forcefully and on aforesaid distress call, informant and his son saw that two persons were running towards the powerhouse in which one was having countrymade pistol and a bag and the other accused was having countrymade pistol. On hearing distress call of Amar Nath, the son of informant deceased-Arif and Aslam (PW2), Shahid Anwar, Mohd. Shahid, Fateh Singh (Tempo Driver), Ilbas, Rakesh Sharma, Muhiuddin and Amar Nath started running to catch aforesaid accused persons and caught hold of one of the accused-person, who on being caught, fired which hit son of informant, namely, Arif, who suffered firearm injury and as a result of the same, accused person was led free and on the same occasion one tempo driver hit his tempo with the accused person, as a result of same, he sustained injury and fell down. Thereafter, Amar Nath got back his bag, which was forcefully taken by accused person and when informant and his son Aslam reached the spot, accused was having countrymade pistol in his hand and there were four live cartridges in his pocket, which was taken in custody. Accused person informed that his name is Kailash s/o Asharfi Lal. Injured-Arif was brought to the hospital by Aslam and other persons and in intervening period police personnel came. The weapon cartridges and bag of Amar Nath was deposited in the police station and first information report was lodged after being scribed by Nasruddin and on the basis of the same, Case Crime No.98 of 2005, under Section 394, 411, 302 I.P.C. and Case Crime No.99 of 2005 under Section 25 Arms Act was registered at 19.20 hours on the same day.
4. The investigation in present case was carried on and panchayatnama of deceased was prepared on 23rd June, 2005. The panchayatnama was held at the S.N. Hospital, Agra on 23rd June, 2005 at 20.20 pm and same was completed at 22.05 pm. The panch witnesses of panchayatnama were Haji Mohd. Gulfam, Abdul Haneef, Mohd. Muim, Shamimoddin, Allauddin and as per opinion of panch witnesses deceased Arif died on account of firearm injury. Thereafter, body was sent for post mortem examination and post mortem held on 24th June, 2005 at 10.00 am. The post mortem was conducted by Dr. A.P. Singh (PW-6). The following injuries were found in the post mortem report:-
Fracture of 3rd lumber vertebra. Metallic bullet 3 cm X 0.8 cm rec
Kartik Malhar Vs. State of Bihar
State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Samman Dass
Khurshid Ahmed Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir (2018) 7 SCC 429
Mohd. Rojali Ali v. State of Assam
Gangabhavani v. Rayapati Venkat Reddy
Dalip Singh v. State of Punjab
Jayabalan v. State (UT of Pondicherry)
Kulwinder Singh v. State of Punjab
Harbans Kaur v. State of Haryana
Surinder Kumar v. State of Punjab
M. Nageswara Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh
Paramhans Yadav and Sadanand Tripathi Vs State of Bihar and others
Pramod Mandal v. State of Bihar
Afrahim Sheikh and Others v. State of West Bengal
Sudip Kr. Sen @ Biltu and others v. State of W.B. & Ors. (2016) 3 SCC 26
State of A.P. v. M. Sohan Babu
Satish Narayan Sawant v. State of Goa
Abdul Waheed Khan v. State of A.P.
Rajwant Singh v. State of Kerala
The court clarified that common intention and premeditation are essential for a murder conviction under Section 302 IPC, and absence of these elements can lead to a lesser charge.
The court modified convictions from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder, emphasizing the need for established common intention among accused, reflecting principles of reasonable doubt....
Common intention requires proof of a prior agreement to commit an offense, with liability under Section 34 based on shared intent and concerted action among accused.
Advocates appeared :For the Appellant : Ashok Kumar Jain For the Respondent : R. K. Awasthi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.