UMESH CHANDRA SHARMA
Harish Chandra – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This application has been made by the accused applicant to quash the order dated 31/10/2008 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 02, Shahjanpur in S.T. No. 799 of 2007 - State Vs. Harish Chandra and others, under Sections 304, 323 and 504 IPC. Police Station Pobayan, District Shahjahanpur, by which the learned Trial Court allowed the Application 13-B U/s 311 Cr.PC and summoned Maina Devi and Usha Devi as witnesses.
2. Heard Sri Pawan Kumar Dubey, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Pankaj Kumar Tripathi, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
3. In brief, facts of the case are that complainant Ramesh Chandra lodged NCR No. 62 of 2007; against Harish Chandra, Matadeen, Sangam and ram Kumar and after death of injured Pankaj, the NCR was converted into FIR U/s 304, 323 and 504 IPC. IO recorded the statements of the informant and so called eye witness Babu Ram and after investigation submitted Charge sheet against the applicant under the aforesaid sections on 05/05/2007. from the bare perusal of the charge sheet it is crystal clear that the statement of the Maina Devi and Smt Usha Devi were neither recorded U/S 161 Cr.P.C nor a single word is ment
Chittarlal Vs. State of Rajasthan
Shri Bhagwan Vs. State of Rajasthan
Satnam Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan
Mannan Shaikh v. State of W.B.
Swapan Kumar Chatterjee v. CBI
Raja Ram Prasad Yadav Vs. State of Bihar and Anr.
R.B. Mithani Vs. State of Maharashtra
State of Haryana Vs. Ram Prasad
Shailendra Kumar Vs. State of Bihar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.