SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 239

UMESH CHANDRA SHARMA
Rashmi Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Akash Chandra Maurya.

JUDGMENT :

UMESH CHANDRA SHARMA, J.

1. Heard Sri Akash Chandra Maurya, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Pankaj Kumar Tripathi, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State and perused the record.

2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been moved to quash the order dated 12.08.2021 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Kanpur Dehat in Misc. Case No. 1319 of 2019 by which the final report in Crime No. 476 of 2018, under Sections 504, 506 and 427 of IPC and under Section 4/10 of Indian Forest Act, 1927 sent by Police Station Mangalpur, Kanpur Dehat was allowed and the Criminal Revision No. 41 of 2021 (Rashmi Devi vs. State of U.P. and Others) was also dismissed by Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge (NDPS Act), Court No. 7, Kanpur Dehat vide order dated 26.09.2022.

3. The facts of the case and ground of the application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. in brief are that the applicant lodged an FIR on 18.12.2018 against opposite party nos. 2 to 5 under the aforesaid sections in which after investigation, the investigating officer (I.O.) submitted the final report No. 45 of 2019 on 14.04.2019 before the concerned Magistrate. According to the applicant th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top