PANKAJ BHATIA
Kuldeep Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Pankaj Bhatia, J.)
1. Heard Shri Neeraj Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri A.C. Tripathi, counsel for the respondents.
2. Present petition has been filed challenging the order dated 06.10.2021, 03.01.2020 and 27.10.2019 passed by the respondent no.1, 2 and 3.
3. Facts, in brief, are that the petitioner was granted a bar license of Hotel Ganesh Garden & Restaurant at Khaier, District Aligarh in the year 2012 under Rule 8(ii) of the Rules relating for vending foreign liquor read with Notification No.25535 and Notification No.10759; license fees is said to have been paid up to the year 2019 - 20.
4. It is alleged against the petitioner that an inspection was carried out at the bar of the petitioner on 02.10.2019 and in the said inspection, certain irregularities were found. From the inspection report it transpires that certain bottles of liquor which were of different shops were found in the bar of the petitioner for which the license was granted. It was also found that the bar was running on the date of prohibition through salesman. In terms of the search and
Nashirwar & Ors. v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.
Kaur & Singh v. Collector of Central Excise, New Delhi
Raj Bahadur Narayan Singh Sugar Mills Ltd. v. U.O.I.
Collector of Central Excise v. H.M.M. Limited
Oryx Fisheries Private Limited v. Union of India
Khem Chand v. Union of India and Others
Aban Loyd Chiles Offshore Ltd. v. Commr. Of Cus., Maharashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.