SADHNA RANI THAKUR
Lalit Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the opp. party no. 2 and perused the record.
2. By moving this application, the prayer is made to quash the order dated 24.12.2018 and 11.3.2016 passed by learned A.C.J.M., Court No. 4, Mathura, in case crime no. 2171 of 2014, Nand Kishor Vs. Lalit Kumar, and the order dated 30.9.2019 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 5, Mathura in Cr. Revision No. 25 of 2019, Lalit Kumar Vs. State of U.P. and another. Prayer is also made to quash the entire proceedings of case no. 2171 of 2014 under section 406 I.P.C., police station Highway District Mathura.
3. As per the facts of the case on 17.9.2011 an FIR under section 406 and 420 I.P.C. was lodged by the opp. Party no. 2 against the applicant Lalit Kumar alleging therein that the opp. party no. 2 and the applicant had agreed orally for sale of two plots belonging to the applicant to the opp. party no. 2. Date 23.5.2011 was fixed for the execution of the sale deed. The whole consideration of Rs. 2 lacs had been paid to the applicant in advance on the date fixed for sale deed. All the stamp papers were purchased in the name of the applicant. The documentation
Bharat Damodar Kale Anr. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (2003) 8 SCC 559
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.