SUNEET KUMAR, RAJENDRA KUMAR IV
Prabhat Kumar Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Seemant Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent.
2. Petitioner applied for the post of Sub-Inspector (Civil Police) and other equivalent post pursuant to Direct Recruitment 2020-21 initiated vide Notification dated 25 February 2021, by the second respondent, Uttar Pradesh Police Recruitment and Promotion Board, Lucknow (for short ‘Board’).
3. By the instant petition, petitioner is challenging the validity of Rule 10 of Uttar Pradesh Sub-Inspector and Inspector (Civil Police) Service (Second Amendment) Rules, 2016 (for short ‘Rules 2016’).
4. Rule 10 provides for eligibility in respect of age. The Rule as initially enacted reads thus:
Provided……...”
5. The Rule subsequently came to be amended in following terms. The amended Rule reads thus:
Chandigarh Administration vs. Usha Kheterpal Waie and others
Khoday Distilleries Ltd. and others vs. State of Karnataka and others
Maharashtra Public Service Commission vs. Sandeep Shriram Warade
Sharma Transport vs. Government of A.P. and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.