TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, SATYEN VAIDYA
Rakesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Satyen Vaidya, J.)
All these petitions were heard and are being decided together as common questions of facts and law are involved. Reference to respondents hereafter has been made in relation to the memorandum of parties in CWP No. 7125 of 2021.
2. Petitioners have prayed for declaring Clause-6 of the Himachal Pradesh Prosecution Department, Assistant District Attorney, Class-I (Gazetted), Recruitment and Promotion Rules, 2017 (for short “2017 Rules”) as ultra vires the Constitution of India. In alternative, a prayer has been made to issue direction to the respondents to relax 2017 Rules for the petitioners in so far as the prescription of maximum age therein is concerned. Clause-6 of 2017 Rules provides for age limit for recruitment to the post of Assistant District Attorneys (for short “ADA”) in the Prosecution Department as “ 35 years and below.”
3. Petitioners are Law Graduate and practicing Advocates. They are aspirants to be appointed as ADAs in the Prosecution Department of the State. In 2021, respondent No. 3 issued an advertisement No. 59/11-2021 inviting applications from desirous and eligible candidates for recruitment to 25 posts of ADAs, Class-I (Gazetted) (o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.