SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 313

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
SHIV SHANKER PRASAD, J.
Rajesh Kumar Giri – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. And 2 Others – Respondents
Application U/S 482 No.5260 of 2023
Decided on : 15-03-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Dipak Srivastava

Point of Law : If a prima facie case is made out disclosing the ingredients of the offence alleged against the accused, the Court cannot quash a criminal proceeding.

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code,1860- Section 354-A, 504, 506 Section 354-A, 504, 506 - Criminal Procedure Code,1973 - Section 156 (3) - Offence of Sexual harassment - Intentional insult – Criminal intimidatopn – Charged- Applicant, is a farmer and social person in his locality - Complainant was village of applicant’s village for period - When complainant was village pradhan he embezzled public money qua development work of village against which father of applicant, has made complaint against him before administrative authority of district - When no action has been taken on said complaint, filed a PIL before Court bearing P.I.L. No. in which Court has passed order directing to make an application before District Magistrate, who inturn was directed to pass such orders in accordance with law thereon - Pursuant to above order of this Court filed an application before District Magistrate for its compliance, but no action has been taken due to political power of complainant/opposite party - Whether there are contradictions or/and inconsistencies in the statements of the witnesses is an essential issue relating to appreciation of evidence and the same can be gone into by Judicial Magistrate during trial when the entire evidence is adduced by the parties - Whether there is truth in improved version of LW.1 and what have been the reasons for his lapse in not stating the same in his earlier statement, can be adjudicated at the time of trial - It is case of such heinous crime where the social ramification of such crimes are very dishonourable to the victim, who suffers social stigma. The offences of this nature which involves social defamation, there is always a general tendency to suppress such events at the initial stage in order to avoid the victim being stigmatized. [Para 16]

Finding of Court : Court is of view that submissions made by applicant's learned counsel call for adjudication on pure questions of fact which may adequately be adjudicated upon only by the trial court and while doing so even submissions made on points of law can also be more appropriately gone into by trial court in this case - Court does not deem it proper, and therefore cannot be persuaded to have a pre-trial before actual trial begins - A threadbare discussion of various facts and circumstances, as they emerge from the allegations made against accused, is being purposely avoided by Court for reason, lest same might cause any prejudice to either side during trial - But it shall suffice to observe that perusal of F.I.R. and material collected by Investigating Officer on basis of which charge sheet has been submitted makes out a prima facie case against the accused at this stage and there appear to be sufficient ground for proceeding against accused - Court do not find any justification to quash the charge sheet or the proceedings against the applicants arising out of them as the case does not fall in any of categories recognized by Apex Court which may justify their quashing.

Result : Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. devoid of merits and is accordingly rejected.

JUDGMENT :

1. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant with a prayer to quash the charge-sheet no. 40 of 2022 dated 28th September, 2022, cognizance taking order dated 15th November, 2022 as well as entire proceedings of Special Trial No. 1191 of 2022 (State VS. Rajesh Kumar Giri), arising out of Case Crime No. 166 of 2021, under Section 354-A, 504, 506 I.P.C. as also under Sections 7/8 POCSO Act, Police Station-Khakheru, District-Fatehpur, pending in the Court of Additional Sessions/Special Judge (POSCO Act), Fatehpur.

2. Heard Mr. Dipak Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A. for the State.

Case of the Applicant

3. Father of the applicant, namely, Bholi Giri is a farmer and social person in his locality. The complainant was village pradhan of the applicant’s village for the period between 2011 to 2015. When the complainant was village pradhan he embezzled public money qua development work of village against which the father of the applicant, namely, Bholi Giri has made complaint against him before the administrative authority of the district. When no action has been taken on the said complaint, Bholi Giri filed a PIL before this Court bearing P.I.L. No. 29962 of 2015 in which this Court has passed order on 21.05.2015 directing Bholi Giri to make an application before the District Magistrate, Fatehpur, who inturn was directed to pass such orders in accordance with law thereon. Pursuant to the above order of this Court Bholi Giri filed an application before the District Magistrate Fatehpur for its compliance, but no action has been taken due to political power of complainant/opposite party, namely, Dhram Singh Pal. On 29th June, 2015, Bholi Giri preferred an application under Section 156 (3) Cr.P.C before concerned court below qua development work in the village against complainant, who was holding the post of pradhan. The complainant had harboured enmity with applicant’ family because he has been defeated in the election of 2015 as Bholi Giri has strongly opposed his candidature as Pradhan and supported his opponent.

4. The Complainant himself went into house of applicant on 08.07.2021 for taking revenge along with his companions, when he did not find any male person, he disrobed the sister of applicant forcefully. Just after knowing such incident with her daughter, applicant’s father went to the Police Station on the same day i.e. 8th July, 2021 for lodging the FIR against the complainant and his companions but the Police has not lodged the report. After that, Bholi Giri made an application before the higher Police Officers through registered post on 16th July, 2021, on which again nothing has been done. On one hand the report of Bholi Giri has not been lodged whereas on the other hand under the pressure of present village Pradhan, namely, Lal @ Durga Paswan, the FIR of complainant has been lodged against the applicant i.e. son of Bholi Giri with false and frivolous allegations, as he has concerned with the allegations made in the FIR.

5. Version as unfolded in the FIR is that on 8th July, 2021 at 06:00 p.m. (evening) when the daughter of the complainant (for short “victim”) aged about 13 years was returning her home with buffaloes from the field, then on the way, he caught her hand and started bad talking and molesting her with bad intentions. When she protested he abused her by saying as to why she did not talk with him. When the victim came to her house and disclosed entire incident to the complainant and his wife, he went to the house of the applicant along with his wife, where the applicant also abused and threatened them.

6. Initially the Police has deliberately lodged the FIR in wrong sections of the provisions POCSO Act but on the notice being issued by the Additional District Judge/Special Judge (POCSO Act), Fatehpur, the FIR has been lodged under Sections 7/8 POCSO Act also along with other charging sections.

7. During the course of investigation the statement

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top