Back
SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI, ANISH KUMAR GUPTA
Aasha Devi – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri Rajnath Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents no. 1 and 4 and Sri Narendra Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondents no. 2 and 3.
2. Rejoinder affidavit filed today is taken on record.
3. On 16.1.2023, this Court passed the following order:-
It is admitted case of the respondents that the petitioner aged about 18 years as on 7.12.2020, lost her right hand below right elbow and left thumb due to electrocution on 22.7.2020 caused by 11 KV three phase line which was found at the height of 1.80 meter as against standard height of 4.6 meter. Thus, physical disability caused to the petitioner by negligence of the respondents is undisputed.
The respondents have merely granted compensation of Rs. 1,40,000/ to the petitioner by which she coul
Compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act must be 'just' and 'equitable'. When actual income evidence is lacking, minimum wage serves as a baseline. Functional disability, not just physical impairmen....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
