SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(All) 1225

SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI, SAURABH SRIVASTAVA
Kaneez Fatima – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Araf Khan, Sonakshi Arora
For the Respondent: Arti Raje

JUDGMENT :

Surya Prakash Kesarwani, J.

1. Heard Shri Araf Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned standing counsel for the State-respondent and Shri M.C.Chaturvedi, learned Senior Advicate assisted by Ms. Arti Raje, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 to 4.

Brief Facts:-

2. Briefly stated, facts of the present case are that the petitioner’s husband, namely Hani Khan died on 10.04.2022 on account of electrocution by 11 KV overhead line which was installed by the respondents at a height of less than 4.7 meters in breach of Rule 77 of of the Rules, 1956 and non-maintenance of the aforesaid line by the respondents as per provisions of Rule 29 of the Rules, 1956.

3. As per admitted case of the respondents, the death of the husband of the petitioner was caused on 10.04.2022. The petitioner submitted entire desired papers including certificate of Maharani Laxmi Bai Medical College and Hospital, Jhansi, dated 10.04.2022 in which cause of death of her husband has been shown as electric c

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top