JUDGMENT :

Surya Prakash Kesarwani, J.

Heard Shri Araf Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned standing counsel for the State-respondent and Shri M.C.Chaturvedi, learned Senior Advicate assisted by Ms. Arti Raje, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 2 to 4.

Brief Facts :

2. Briefly stated, facts of the present case are that the petitioner's husband, namely Hani Khan died on 10.4.2022 on account of electrocution by 11 KV overhead line which was installed by the respondents at a height of less than 4.7 meters in breach of Rule 77 of the Rules, 1956 and non-maintenance of the aforesaid line by the respondents as per provisions of Rule 29 of the Rules, 1956.

3. As per admitted case of the respondents, the death of the husband of the petitioner was caused on 10.4.2022. The petitioner submitted entire desired papers including certificate of Maharani Laxmi Bai Medical College and Hospital, Jhansi, dated 10.4.2022 in which cause of death of her husband has been shown as electric current, Panchnama dated 10.4.2022 and death certificate dated 20.4.2022 etc. of her husband.

4. Petition