KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR
Mukesh Kumar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India Through Prin. Secy. Central Reserve Police Fo. – Respondent
ORDER :
(Karunesh Singh Pawar, J.)
1. Heard Shri Sanjeev Kumar Pandey, learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms. Alina Masoodi, Advocate holding brief of Shri Raj Kumar Singh, learned Counsel for the respondents.
2. Through this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the order of termination dated 30.12.2011 passed by the Commandant, 91st Battalion, Group Kendra, Central Reserve Police Force, District Lucknow (opposite party no.4) contained as Annexure-1 to the writ petition and the appellate order dated 14.11.2012 passed by the Inspector General of Police, Central Sector, Central Reserve Police Force, Lucknow (opposite party no.2) contained as Annexure-2 to the writ petition. The petitioner is also seeking a writ of Mandamus directing the opposite parties to reinstate him in service on the post of Constable with effect from the date of termination from service i.e. on 3.11.2012 with all consequential benefits.
3. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was appointed on the post of Constable by means of order dated 20.8.2011. This appointment order clearly stated that petitioner’s service is purely temporary in nature
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.