Dinesh Yadav vs State Of U. P. - 2023 Supreme(All) 571

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(All) 571

RAJ BEER SINGH
Dinesh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Kashi Nath Singh Yadav
For the Respondent: Mithilesh Kumar Gupta

JUDGMENT :

1. Rejoinder affidavit filed by learned counsel for the applicant today, is taken on record.

2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant-accused, learned counsel for the first informant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

3. The present bail application has been filed by the applicant-accused involved in Case Crime No.71 of 2022, under Sections 376, 452, 506 IPC and section 3/4 POCSO Act, P.S. Revatipur, District Ghazipur with the prayer to enlarge him on bail.

4. It has been argued by learned counsel for the applicant-accused that the applicant-accused is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel submitted that alleged incident has been shown of 05.07.2022 but first information report has been lodged after three days on 08.07.2022. It was submitted that the allegation of victim that applicant-accused has committed rape upon her, is thoroughly false. In medical examination report of victim, no injury has been shown on the body of victim. It is submitted that applicant-accused has been falsely implicated on account of enmity over land dispute. It was further submitted that applicant-accused is languishing in jail since 08.07

Click Here to Read the rest of this document