SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(All) 2553

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Banti – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Pankaj Sharma,Prashant Sharma
For the Respondent: G.A.

JUDGMENT :

Krishan Pahal, J.

1. List has been revised.

2. Learned A.G.A. has informed that notice to the informant has been served on 19.12.2024.

3. Heard Sri Prashant Sharma, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Deepak Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

4. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.209 of 2024, under Sections 333, 65(1), 351(2) B.N.S. and 3/4 POCSO Act, Police Station- Hasayan, District- Hathras, during the pendency of trial.

PROSECUTION STORY:

5. The applicant is stated to have outraged the modesty of the minor daughter of the informant aged about 13 years by barging into his house. The said act was seen by the son of the informant, as such, the applicant is stated to have run away by threatening on 11.10.2024 at about 01:00 a.m.

ARGUMENTS ON BEHALF OF APPLICANT:

6. The applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case.

7. The FIR is delayed by about fourteen hours and there is no explanation of the said delay caused.

8. The FIR does not mention that victim was raped up, although, it is stated that applicant had done some indecent act with her. The allegations have been escalated to that of rape in the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top