Back
KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR
Devi Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. Thru Secy. Agriculture Deptt. Civil Sectt. – Respondent
ORDER :
(Karunesh Singh Pawar, J.)
1. Heard Sri Prabhat Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-opposite parties and perused the record.
2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following final reliefs:
b. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the opposite party no. 2 to provide the petitioner regular promotion in Subordinate Agriculture Service GroupII(Class-III) post since 24.01.1980 along with 12% interest."
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was appointed on 24.06.1966 in the Subordinate Agriculture Service (S.A.S.) Group-III as Assistant Soil Conservation Inspector in the office of Bhomi Sanrakshan Adhikari, Etawah. He was confirmed on 01.01.1974. He was given promotion on 2
Promotions may be granted retrospectively with salary when administrative delays occur due to no fault of the employee, avoiding disparate treatment based on administrative negligence.
An employee denied promotion due to administrative errors is entitled to retrospective promotion and benefits once exonerated from charges.
Post exoneration in disciplinary/criminal proceedings, employee entitled to retrospective promotion with actual monetary benefits from due date, not notional, absent recorded reasons for denial; 'no ....
Employees are not entitled to back wages for notional promotions without actual performance of duties on respective posts.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
