JUDGMENT :

(Shree Prakash Singh, J.)

1. On 04.04.2023, this Court observed that if, the counsel for the opposite party will not remain present on the next date, the Court will proceed in absence of the opposite party.

2. Case called out. None present on behalf of the opposite party.

3. This Court is proceeding to hear the matter in the aforesaid circumstances.

4. Heard Sri Sanjay Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the revisionist, Sri Anirudh Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record.

5. By means of the instant revision, the prayer has been made to allow the revision with cost after summoning the lower court record and set aside the impugned judgment and order dated 26.09.2015 passed by the trial court i.e. Principal Judge, Family Court, Ambedkar Nagar in Case no. 272 of 2013 Smt Tarawati Vs Dr Arun Kumar Singhal.

6. Learned counsel appearing for the revisionist submits that the opposite party filed an application under section 125 of Cr.P.C. on 18.01.2011, against the revisionist before the Judicial Magistrate, Ambedkar Nagar while alleging herself to be the widow of late Parshuram son of Ram Naresh, resident of Village Bela Persa, PS- B