SANGEETA CHANDRA, NARENDRA KUMAR JOHARI
Kiran Rawat – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. Thru. Secy. Home, Lko. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Shri Jalaj Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Arun Kumar Pandey, learned A.G.A. for the State/respondents Nos.1 to 3 and perused the record.
2. The writ petitioners have come before this Court praying for a writ in the nature of mandamus to be issued to the respondents not to disturb the peaceful living of the petitioners.
3. The petition has only fourteen paragraphs.
4. The relevant facts are stated in paragraphs 4 to 10, which are being quoted herein below:—
5. That it is relevant to point out here that the petitioner No.1 is aged about 29 years and the petitioner No.2 is aged about 30 years being major in age, living with each other due to their prolonged love and affection. A copy of Birth certificate issued by Nagar Nigam, Lucknow, showing the age of the petitioners are being annexed herewith as Annexure No.1.
6. That it is submitted that as per information of the petitioners no F.I.R. has been lodged against them.
7. That the local Police is harassing the petitioner No. 2 and his family members as the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.