SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2815

SANGEETA CHANDRA, NARENDRA KUMAR JOHARI
Kajal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioners: Afaq Zaki Khan.
For the Respondents: G.A.

JUDGMENT

Sangeeta Chandra, J.

Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. for the State/respondents Nos.1 to 3 and perused the record.

3. The writ petitioners have come before this Court praying for a writ in the nature of mandamus to be issued to the respondents not to disturb the peaceful living of the petitioners.

4. The petition has only Fourteen paragraphs.

5. The relevant facts are stated in paragraphs 4 to 10, which are being quoted herein below:-

    "4. That, fact giving rise to the present petition are that the petitioners 1 and 2 are major by age as per adhar card date of birth of the petitioner no.1, 26.10.1998 approximately she is aged about 25 years and petitioner no.2 his date of birth as per adhar card is 06.08.1997 and he is aged about 26 years of age as such both are major and living together out of their own free will and without any kind of pressure or fear. Copy of adhar card of both the petitioners are being annexed as annexure no.1 to this writ petition.

    5. That, as a matter of fact petitioners are resident of District Lucknow and petitioner no.2 is doing private job and petitioner no.1 is

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top