SUBHASH VIDYARTHI
Mukesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Sri Bharat Kumar Dixit, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Akhilesh Kumar Vyas, learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri Jaikaran, learned counsel for the informant and perused the records.
2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 478 of 2022, under Sections 386 and 506 I.P.C. and 3/25 Arms Act, registered at Police Station Millarea (Industrial Area), District Raebareli.
3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 23.11.2022 against three persons, including the applicant, alleging that the accused persons are threatening the informant for extorting money from him.
4. In the affidavit filed in support of bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case.
5. A supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the applicant explaining his alleged involvement in 27 other cases, 8 of which have been mentioned wrongly and in all the other cases, the applicant has already been granted bail. Both the other named accused persons Badal Singh and Raghvendra Singh @ Subham Singh have already
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.