Ram Kumari vs State Of U. P. - 2023 Supreme(All) 826

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(All) 826

RAJAN ROY, MANISH KUMAR
Ram Kumari – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Vikas Chandra Dwivedi
For the Respondent: C.S.C., Prachish Pandey

JUDGMENT :

1. Let the Sub-Registrar, Malihabad, Lucknow be impleaded as an opposite party during course of the day.

2. Petitioner is the mother of Budhi Lal, who has been convicted of the offence under Section 302 read with 34 I.P.C. in Sessions Trial No. 471 of 2010 (Case Crime No. 577 of 2009), Police Station Malihabad, District Lucknow and is in prison.

3. Petition has been filed seeking following relief:-

"i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding and directing the opposite party no. 2 i.e. District Magistrate, Lucknow to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 29.08.2022 and permit to the petitioner to get execution of registered power of attorney from her son namely Budha Lal @ Budhi Lal in the interest of justice."

4. We had heard this matter at length on earlier date i.e. 06.4.2023 and passed the following order :-

"This petition has been filed seeking following main prayer:-

"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby commanding and directing the opposite party No.2 i.e. District Magistrate, Lucknow to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 29.08.2022 and permit to the petitioner to get execu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(All) 826

RAJAN ROY, MANISH KUMARRam Kumari – AppellantVersusState Of U. P. – Respondent

RAJAN ROY, MANISH KUMAR
Ram Kumari – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent