JUDGMENT :

1. With the consent of learned counsels for both the parties, these two petitions shall be heard together and disposed of with a common order.

2. Heard Sri Alok Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Satyendra Kumar Tripathi, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent nos.1 to 3.

3. Writ A No.29840 of 2010 has been filed seeking the following relief:-

“A. Issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of certiorari, quashing the impugned dismissal order dated 31.03.2010 passed by the Respondent no.3 (Annexure No.21).

B. Issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondents No.2 and 3 to allow the petitioner to work as Nalkoop Mistry, Nalkoop Anurakshan Khand, Bhadohi under Nalkoop Mandal of respondent No.2 and Division of respondent No.3.

E. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus declaring Paragraph-Ga of office memorandum dated 09.09.2008 issued by Chief Engineer as ultra-vires to Rule 9-Kha of the Service Rules.”

4. Writ A No.18844 of 2010 has been filed seeking the following relief:-

a) Issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of certiorari, quashing the impugned dismissal order dated 25.03.2