Back
CHANDRA KUMAR RAI
Vipin Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Heard Mr. Arun Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Abhishek Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents and Mr. Avinash Chandra Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondent no.4-Gaon Sabha.
2. The instant petition has been filed for the following reliefs:
ii. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent authorities to ensure the compliance of the order dated 9.6.1993 passed by the Tahsildar in Case No.213 /90 of 1993 (Vijay Pral Vs. Maya Devi) under Section 34 of Land Revenue Act and hand over the management and control of temple Thakur Ramchandraji Maharaj Virajman Mandir, Pachokhara, Tahsil- Tundala, District- Firozabad.
iii. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent authorities to evict the respondent nos.5 & 6 from unauthorized possession of the temple Thakur Ramchandraji Maharaj Virajman Mandir and hand over the management of the temple to the Gram Panchaya
A suit under Section 92 C.P.C. must be filed in the Principal Civil Court of original jurisdiction, not in a Civil Judge's Court, and the absence of a trust-deed does not prevent admission.
Plaint under Section 92 CPC not rejected under Order VII Rule 11 where it discloses cause of action via fraud/breach allegations in public religious trust; limitation/mixed issues triable; no partial....
Supersession of a religious trust committee must comply with statutory provisions; failure to do so renders the action arbitrary and subject to judicial review.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
