SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 980

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
AURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J.
Arun Kumar Jain And 3 Others – Appellants
Versus
Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal And 7 Others – Respondent
Writ C No. 10936 of 2014
Decided on : 22-08-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Sri H.N. Singh, Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Vineet Kumar Singh, Advocate
For the Respondent:Standing Counsel Sri Brijesh Kumar Kesharwani, Advocate

Headnote:

Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 - Section 13(2) and 13 (3A) - Business of cold storage - Credit facility from respondent bank - Failed to repay loan amount – Challenged - Whether 25% of sale amount shall be inclusive of earnest amount or not and whether in some circumstances, said amount could be deposited on next working day also and effect of amendment carried out in Rule 9(3) of Rules, 2002 (i.e. ‘Doctrine of Relation Back’) has any bearing in facts and circumstances of present case – Held, auction took place and as referred above, 25% of sale amount including earnest amount was paid by the auction purchasers (petitioners) on very next working day - According to SARFAESI Act, remaining 75% amount of sale price was to be deposited on or before - Time of 15 days is not sacrosanct since it could be extended - Though there was no written agreement, still delay has been explained and said delay has not prejudiced borrowers in any manner, since even during pendency of present writ petition, borrowers have failed to offer money - Writ petition is allowed.

ORDER :

1. This writ petition is being filed by auction purchasers being aggrieved by impugned order dated 19.11.2013 passed by Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad in Appeal No. R214 of 2013 whereby said appeal filed by petitioners was dismissed. By amendment, petitioners have also challenged the order dated 23.10.2013 passed by Debts Recovery Tribunal, Allahabad in Securitization Application No. 153 of 2009.

FACTUAL MATRIX

2. M/s Firozabad Cold Storage Ltd., its Managing Director and others, who are respondents no. 4 to 8 (hereinafter referred to as “borrowers”) have availed credit facility from the respondent bank (Bank of Baroda) sanctioned on 14.10.2005 for the business of cold storage.

3. The borrowers have failed to repay the loan amount, therefore, the respondent bank has issued a notice dated 06.04.2009 under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short “SARFAESI Act”). The borrowers have submitted their reply on 01.06.2009 under Section 13 (3A) of SARFAESI Act.

4. The borrowers remained failed to repay the loan, therefore, a notice dated 13.09.2009 under Section 13(4) of SARFAESI Act and Rule (8) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 (for short “Rules”) was issued by the bank. Later on, an auction notice dated 14.11.2009 was published by the respondent bank for auction of property in question.

5. The borrowers have filed a S.A. No. 153 of 2009 before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Allahabad on 14.12.2009 challenging the notice dated 13.09.2009 i.e. a possession notice issued under Section 13(4) of SARFAESI Act and Rule 8(1) of Rules made therein.

6. The respondent bank took possession of property under auction on 23.09.2009 and auction sale was fixed on 16.12.2009, however, auction was not materialized on 16.12.2009.

7. During pendency of above referred S.A. No. 153 of 2009, the respondent bank has published a second auction notice on 05.07.2010 in newspapers, fixing 12.08.2010 for auction sale. The terms and conditions as mentioned in notice are reproduced hereinafter -:

    ^^fu;e o 'krsZ %& ¼1½ bPNqd fufonkdrkZ lEcaf/kr lEifŸk Ø; djus gsrq vius izLrko VsaMj jkf'k ekax MªkV }kjk tks izkf/kd`r vf/kdkjh cSad vkWQ cMksnk ds i{k esa vkgfjr fd;k x;k gks ds lkFk can fyQkQs esa HkstsA vlQy fufonkdrkZvks dks c;kuksa dh jkf'k fcuk fdlh C;kt ds okil dj nh tk,xhA ;fn lQy cksyhnkrk foØ; dh 'krksZ le; dk ikyu ugha djrk ;k vU; fdlh izdkj dh pwd djrk gS rks c;ku dh jkf'k fcuk fdlh iwoZ lwpuk ds tCr dj yh tk,xhA izLrko lEcaf/kr 'kk[kk ds ikl fnukad 12-8-2010 dks nksigj 2 cts rd ;k blls igys tek dj fn, tk,WA ¼2½ lhy can fufonk, izkf/kd`r vf/kdkjh }kjk mifLFkr fufonkdrkZvksa ds le{k Åij nf'kZr txg o le; ij [kksyh tk,xhA ¼3½ fufonk, [kqyus ds ckn izkf/kd`r vf/kdkjh ds foosd ij bPNqd [kjhnkjksa dks ijLij lgefr }kjk izLrkfor ewY; cढ+kus dk volj fn;k tk ldrk gSA ¼4½ lQy fufonknkrk dks foØ; ewY; dh 25 izfr'kr /kujkf'k ¼c;kuk jkf'k lfgr½ foØ; frfFk dks gh udn vFkok mijksDrkuqlkj ekWx MªkV }kjk tek djuh gksxh foØ; ewY; dh 'ks"k /kujkf'k izkf/kd`r vf/kdkjh vFkok flD;ksMZ ØsfMVlZ }kjk foØ; dh iqf"V ds 15 fnu ds Hkhrj vFkok fn;s x;s le; rd tek djuh gksxhA blesa pwd gksus ij ml le; rd tek dh x;h lEiw.kZ jde tCr dj yh tk,xhA ¼5½ lQy fufonknkrk dks lEifŸk dh jftLVªh djkus gsrq leLr LVkWEi o jftLVªs'ku 'kqYd o vU; O;; Loa; ogu djus gksaxsA izkf/kd`r vf/kdkjh ds ikl fcuk dkj.k crk, fdlh Hkh fufonk dks Lohd`r@vLohd`r@LFkfxr@jnn djus dk vf/kdkj vkSj foØ; fu;eksa ,oa 'krksZ esa la'kks/ku djus ds vf/kdkj lqjf{kr gksaxsA ¼6½ izkf/kd`r vf/kdkjh] ekfyd@cksyhnkrk@vke turk dks lwpuk fn, fcuk fcØh dks jnn@LFkfxr dj ldrk gS vkSj@;k fdlh Hkh fu;e o 'krksZ dks fdlh Hkh le; cny ldrk gS@tksM ldrk gS@gVk ldrk gSA ¼7½ bPNqd [kjhnnkj lEcfa/kr 'kk[kk ls fdlh Hkh dk;Z fnol esa lEidZ dj lEifŸk dk eqvk;uk dj ldr gS ,oa vf/kd tkudkjh ds fy, lEidZ dj ldrs gSA

LFkku % vkxjk

                    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                    1
                    2
                    3
                    4
                    5
                    6
                    7
                    8
                    9
                    10
                    11
                    Judicial Analysis

                    SupremeToday

                    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                    supreme today icon
                    logo-black

                    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                    Please visit our Training & Support
                    Center or Contact Us for assistance

                    qr

                    Scan Me!

                    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                    whatsapp-icon Back to top